The 10 Worst Music Briefing Mistakes (And How to Fix Them)

Creating a music brief can feel daunting.

Miscommunication, vague instructions, and poor planning can waste valuable budget and creative energy. In this guide, we highlight the 10 biggest music briefing mistakes you need to avoid to consistently deliver standout audio for your projects.

Mistake #1: Not Clearly Defining Success or Accountability (And How to Set Clear Expectations)

Why Unclear Goals Lead to Frustration

Briefs without clear success criteria cause projects to drift off course, leading to endless revisions, frustration, and creative compromises.

Without explicit, measurable goals, both clients and music producers struggle to align, and neither party wants a drawn-out process of stabbing around in the creative wilderness until something sticks.

Removal of this ambiguity means that creativity can then be applied with a clear sense of what success looks like – rather than in isolation of it.

Defining Success in Your Music Brief Template

To ensure everyone involved understands exactly what’s expected—and to hold them accountable—use these best practices:

• Set Clear Objectives:
  Clearly articulate the strategic goals of the audio. Is the goal emotional impact, brand recall, narrative reinforcement, or something else? Be explicit.
• Specify Deliverables:
  Detail exactly what is required—track length, formats, timelines, and technical specifications. Clearly defined deliverables streamline the production process.
• Include Accountability Metrics:
  Define metrics or benchmarks (like audience reaction, engagement, or brand association) that will be used to measure success.
• Prioritise Alignment:
  It’s a big ask, but seek to align creative intent and strategic objectives – without compromising either. By defining what success looks like for every stakeholder involved, you set the project up for clear, unified goals right from the outset.

By defining what success looks like clearly and precisely, you help remove one of the main factors that causes delays; that the creative idea doesn’t align with the strategic goal.

Mistake #2: Not Aligning Creative vs Strategic Goals

Why Briefs That Fail to Achieve Creative & Strategic Balance Fall Short

One of the most common music briefing mistakes is focusing too heavily on either creative or strategic objectives at the expense of the other. Creatively driven briefs might produce music that sounds impressive but fails to resonate with your target audience or achieve strategic outcomes. Conversely, overly strategic briefs risk feeling sterile, predictable, or emotionally unengaging.

Briefs that neglect this balance inevitably lead to internal disagreements, endless revisions, and a final product that lacks genuine impact.

Balancing Creative vs Strategic Brief Objectives

The key to avoiding these music briefing mistakes is integrating creative ambition with strategic clarity from the outset. Here’s how:

• Define Clear, Measurable Strategic Goals:
  What should your music achieve strategically—brand recall, emotional resonance, campaign recognition? Outline these explicitly.
• Encourage Bold, Anti-Obvious Creative Thinking:
  Allow space for creativity and innovation that genuinely excites audiences rather than ticking predictable boxes.
• Align Creative and Strategic Priorities Early:
  Involve creatives, strategists, and composers collaboratively from the start. Identify potential friction points between creative and strategic aims, and resolve them upfront.
• Evaluate and Refine Collaboratively:
  Throughout the process, check regularly whether your audio is balancing both goals effectively, adjusting as needed.

Our proprietary SONAL framework addresses precisely these music briefing mistakes, naturally blending creative vision and strategic purpose into briefs that consistently deliver impactful, standout audio.

Mistake #3: Over-Reliance on Reference Tracks

Why Too Many Reference Tracks Hurt Your Brief

Using reference tracks might seem like a helpful shortcut – but it’s one of the most common music briefing mistakes teams make.

Over-reliance on references often leads to derivative, uninspired audio. Reference tracks quickly shift from inspiration to imitation, limiting your project’s creative potential and often resulting in predictable, beige outcomes that blend into the noise rather than stand out.

Additionally, relying heavily on musical jargon to describe your vision can cause confusion, especially if you’re not confident in technical terms. The “#IDontSpeakMusic” phenomenon is a frequent source of miscommunication between teams and composers.

Why Reference Tracks in Music Briefs Can Limit Creativity

To avoid falling into these common music briefing mistakes, follow these recommendations:

• Use Reference Tracks Sparingly & Strategically:
  If you do use references, clarify exactly which elements you like—mood, tempo, instrumentation—but encourage composers to create fresh interpretations rather than replicating.
• Prioritise Originality & Innovation:
  Push beyond familiar territory. Encourage composers to present bold, original ideas instead of staying strictly within the confines of existing examples.
• Ditch the Jargon & Speak Clearly:
  Instead of forcing yourself into unfamiliar musical terminology, articulate your needs using emotional or visual descriptors. Clearly communicate your strategic intentions and emotional goals, leaving composers to translate those into musical ideas.
• Collaborate Through Clear, Common Language:
  Adopt a collaborative briefing approach like SONAL, which helps visual thinkers and non-musicians communicate intuitively and confidently, eliminating jargon-related misunderstandings.

By reducing your reliance on reference tracks and avoiding overly technical musical language, you’ll consistently produce audio that feels fresh, distinctive, and authentically aligned with your project’s goals.

Mistake #4: Using Vague, Generic Terms That Lack Personality (And How to Avoid Them)

Why Generic Briefs Lead to Predictable Results

One of the most common pitfalls in music briefing is relying on vague and generic descriptions. Terms like “upbeat,” “emotional,” or “memorable” are overly broad and rarely translate clearly into actionable insights for composers or sound designers.

Generic briefs lead directly to generic outcomes – work that feels predictable, beige, and derivative… And nobody wants that.

When your music brief lacks distinct personality or specificity, you’re inadvertently setting your project up to blend in, rather than stand out.

Writing Music Briefs with Personality: Real Examples

To avoid producing forgettable soundtracks, follow these steps to add personality to your briefs:

• Speak Your Language, Not Musical Jargon:
  You don’t have to be fluent in music terminology to communicate your vision effectively. Speak to your composer in simple adjectives, free of pressure about whether you’re being clear or not.
• Use Concrete Examples:
  Instead of generic terms, describe specific feelings or scenes. For example, rather than “uplifting,” try “the feeling of finishing a marathon” or “the excitement of unwrapping a gift.”
• Make It Personal:
  Reference your personal or brand values, narrative arcs, or even individual tastes to help composers truly understand the unique essence of your project.

By communicating your vision authentically and personally- without leaning on vague or generic phrases- you dramatically increase your chances of receiving original, impactful music tailored specifically to you.

Mistake #5: Rushing the Brief to Get to Production (And Why Slowing Down Pays Off)

The Hidden Costs of a Rushed Brief

It’s tempting to rush through the briefing stage to get straight into production—after all, time is money. However, treating the brief as just another box to tick often ends up costing you significantly more time and budget in the long run.

Rushed briefs create ambiguity and misunderstanding, increasing the risk of endless revisions, unnecessary stress, and disappointing results. In our experience, the vast majority of project setbacks—delays, creative compromises, and budget overspends—can be traced directly back to an inadequate briefing phase.

Simply put, if you hurry at the start, you’ll likely spend even more time trying to fix things later.

Why Investing Time Writing Music Briefs Pays Off

Shifting your mindset to view the briefing stage as an essential investment rather than a formality is key to delivering standout audio smoothly and efficiently.

A comprehensive creative brief sets a clear, unified creative direction from the outset. This clarity results in fewer revisions, less friction, and quicker approvals across your whole project team.

Our SONAL approach was specifically designed around this idea. Instead of racing through the brief, SONAL ensures thorough alignment upfront—integrating your creative intent with strategic objectives. This means everyone involved understands exactly what’s required, leading to faster sign-offs, better creative outcomes, and ultimately, happier clients.

Investing just a little more energy into your brief at the beginning is the smartest way to streamline your entire production process, delivering bold results without the usual hassle.

Mistake #6: Single-Perspective Briefs – One of the Biggest Music Briefing Mistakes

Why Single-Perspective Music Briefs Fail

Music briefs created from a single viewpoint—such as the creative director or a solitary decision-maker—are among the most common music briefing mistakes. These narrow perspectives often neglect critical input from strategists, producers, or composers themselves. As a result, the music produced frequently resonates deeply with one stakeholder but misses critical strategic objectives or broader audience needs.

How to Brief Music Collaboratively & Communicate With Composers

Successful briefs integrate multiple viewpoints. By combining perspectives from across your team—including creative, strategic, and production inputs—you significantly enhance the quality and relevance of the music.

Follow these best practices to avoid single-perspective briefing:

• Gather Diverse Stakeholder Input Early:
  Encourage team-wide participation in the briefing phase to clearly define and agree upon creative and strategic objectives.
• Avoid Musical Jargon—Focus on Emotional & Strategic Clarity:
  Communicate clearly with composers by articulating emotional and strategic outcomes rather than technical jargon.
• Set Shared Objectives & Success Criteria:
  Ensure everyone agrees on what successful audio looks like from the outset, preventing costly misunderstandings.
• Keep Communication Open & Inclusive:
  Maintain consistent dialogue between composers and stakeholders throughout the project, refining alignment along the way.

At The Futz Butler, we’ve tackled exactly these music briefing mistakes head-on with our collaborative SONAL method, ensuring music briefs are comprehensive, inclusive, and aligned with all stakeholder perspectives.

Mistake #7: Creativity in Isolation When Writing Music Briefs

Why Isolated Creativity Undermines Your Music Brief

One of the most overlooked music briefing mistakes is allowing creativity to happen in isolation, disconnected from strategic input, stakeholder expectations, or practical constraints. When composers work without regular, meaningful feedback, the resulting music often misses strategic targets, frustrating stakeholders and composers alike.

How to Give Feedback to Composers and Keep Creativity Aligned

Here’s how to avoid isolated creativity and ensure your music brief leads to consistently effective audio:

• Provide Regular, Structured Feedback:
  Establish clear checkpoints. Provide timely, constructive feedback focused on both strategic alignment and creative quality.
• Use Emotional & Strategic Language:
  Avoid vague, jargon-heavy instructions. Instead, describe clearly how the music aligns or diverges from your emotional and strategic goals.
• Keep Your Composer Involved in Strategic Conversations:
  Regularly communicate strategic objectives, allowing composers to make informed creative decisions that resonate deeply with audiences.

Our SONAL approach solves these music briefing mistakes through continuous alignment, ensuring creative ideas consistently match strategic intent.

Mistake #8: Accepting Design by Committee

Why Design by Committee Weakens Your Audio

“Design by committee” is a familiar scenario—when multiple stakeholders influence decisions, often watering down strong ideas to satisfy everyone. This scenario ranks high among common music briefing mistakes because it typically leads to bland, predictable audio that lacks originality or emotional impact.

Creating Consensus Without Compromising Your Music Brief

Here’s how to avoid this classic music briefing mistake:

• Clarify Stakeholder Roles & Decision-making:
  Clearly identify decision-makers and align stakeholders around clear criteria for creative decisions.
• Set Clear Strategic Priorities:
  Agree upfront what strategic or creative criteria decisions will be based on, removing subjectivity from the process.
• Facilitate Structured Discussions:
  Use structured, guided conversations (like those at the heart of our SONAL methodology) to ensure everyone’s voice is heard without diluting the creative outcome.
• Embrace Bold, Anti-Obvious Creative Approaches:
  Encourage your team to trust bold ideas rather than settling on safe, diluted compromises.

By setting clear expectations and embracing structured collaboration, you can ensure your music remains focused, compelling, and distinctively aligned with your goals.

Mistake #9: Focusing on Sound Over Emotion When Writing Music Briefs

Why Prioritising Sound Can Lead Your Music Brief Astray

Many briefs mistakenly fixate on how the music should sound—specific genres, instruments, or stylistic details—instead of what emotional effect it should achieve. This focus on technical details is one of the most common music briefing mistakes, limiting creativity and leading to derivative, predictable audio.

Audio Branding Mistakes: Why Emotion Matters More Than Sound

To avoid these common audio branding mistakes:

• Brief Based on Emotional Outcomes:
  Instead of prescribing genres or instrumentation, clearly articulate the emotions your audience should feel. Is it nostalgia, excitement, inspiration, or curiosity?
• Ask “Why,” Not Just “What”:
  Explain why certain emotional outcomes matter strategically, allowing composers the freedom to innovate.
• Evaluate Success Emotionally & Strategically:
  Rather than judging music purely on aesthetics or personal preference, measure it against clearly defined emotional and strategic outcomes.

Our unique SONAL approach places emotional resonance front and centre, eliminating traditional music briefing mistakes by focusing explicitly on what you need the music to achieve – not just how it should sound.

Mistake #10: Writing Music Briefs That Are Too Short

Why Short Briefs Sabotage Your Project

Many creative teams mistakenly think shorter briefs save time. The reality? Overly brief briefs lead to misunderstandings, missed opportunities, and creative frustrations.

Most briefs are too short, vague, and homogeneous—not personal and specific. This cursory approach doesn’t help your audio partner deliver effectively and leads to prolonged rounds of amends, wasting precious time and budget.

Simply put, when a brief lacks detail, musicians and sound designers have no clear picture of your vision, inevitably causing misinterpretation, wasted effort, and costly revisions.

How to Brief Music Clearly: Essential Elements to Include

A comprehensive brief is thorough yet concise. To avoid ambiguity, include:

• Clear Objectives:
  Define explicitly what the audio needs to achieve.
• Project Context:
  Share background about your project, the audience, and intended emotional impact.
• Specificity, Not Generality:
  Avoid overly generic terms (“uplifting,” “catchy”). Opt for adjectives or emotional descriptors that are specific and personal.
• Clarity on ‘Must-Haves’:
  What aspects are non-negotiable? Length, tone, messaging?

The SONAL approach addresses this exact issue by using structured, strategic questions to craft effective briefs that clearly communicate intent, eliminating guesswork:

“SONAL makes the unnecessarily tricky process of describing what’s in your head effortless—delivering a soundtrack that genuinely feels like an extension of you.”

In short, don’t skimp on detail—invest in clarity upfront to get standout results faster.

Conclusion: Avoiding Common Music Briefing Mistakes for Standout Audio

Creating impactful, memorable audio starts with a great brief. By steering clear of these ten common music briefing mistakes, you’re immediately setting your project up for greater success—creatively, strategically, and emotionally.

Avoiding pitfalls like vague instructions, single-perspective briefs, or over-relying on reference tracks ensures your creative vision remains bold, authentic, and unmistakably yours. Ultimately, great briefs produce great results: music and sound that resonate deeply with your audience and genuinely stand apart.

At The Futz Butler, we’ve revolutionised how briefs are crafted with our unique approach—SONAL. Designed specifically to tackle these frequent music briefing mistakes, SONAL seamlessly translates your ideas into compelling, standout audio, every time.

Ready to transform the way you brief music and sound?

FAQs